|
back
to mainpage |
GEO
TV petition dismissed as non-maintainable by Sindh High Court
The News
December 05, 2007 |
http://www.thenews.com.pk/top_story_detail.asp?Id=11541
KARACHI: The Sindh High Court on Tuesday dismissed petitions against
the ban on the transmission of Geo TV channels as not maintainable.
The Independent Media Corporation and Bird (Pvt)
Ltd had challenged the ban on the transmission of Geo News, Geo
Entertainment, Geo Super and Aag TV channels by the government.
The SHC’s division bench comprising Justice
Munib Ahmed Khan and Justice Dr Rana Mohammad Shamim dismissed both
the petitions being non-maintainable on the ground that under the
Provisional Constitution Order and emergency rule, the petitions
were not maintainable under the Article 199 of the Constitution
because many fundamental rights were suspended.
The petitioners’ counsel, Mohammad Ali Mazhar,
argued that on the last date of hearing, the deputy attorney general
had raised two points that Geo News was off-aired from Dubai and
a similar petition by an individual had been filed in the Supreme
Court and on the above grounds, further time was sought by him.
He submitted that in spite of availing many chances,
no comments have been filed by the respondents. He said now both
the objections raised by the DAG on the last date had become irrelevant
and insignificant because the Dubai Media City had already restored
the transmission of Geo News and the petition filed by one stranger
in the Supreme Court of Pakistan had been returned to him with the
office objections that the petitioner before the Supreme Court was
not an aggrieved person; secondly the scope of Article 184 (3) had
been curtailed under the PCO and emergency.
It was further argued by Mohammad Ali Mazhar that
being an aggrieved person, the jurisdiction under Article 199 of
the Constitution was still available to the petitioners. The petitioner
has obtained landing right licences from Pemra against the payment
of valuable licence fees which are still valid and without issuing
any show-cause notice or written order, the transmission of channels
have been suspended verbally which is an illegal act, he contended.
The counsel argued that articles 18, 4, 2-A of the
Constitution were not suspended under the PCO and being a commercial
organisation, the right to business was still available to the petitioners
without any hindrance and obstruction. At present, he said, petitions
have nothing to do with Article 19 of the Constitution, which relates
to the freedom of expression, speech and press.
He said verbal ban on TV channels was totally unlawful
and against the articles 18, 4 and 2-A of the Constitution of Pakistan.
The bench asked the petitioners’ counsel as to how the petition
was maintainable in view of the PCO and emergency when certain fundamental
rights had been suspended including Article 19.
He reiterated, in response, that Articles 18 and
4 of the Constitution were not suspended and in support of his argument,
he relied upon the full bench judgments of the Supreme Court of
Pakistan pronounced in the Sardar Farooq Ahmed Khan Leghari and
Zafar Ali Shah cases in which it had been held that in spite of
the PCO or emergency, the Article 199 will remain available to an
aggrieved person and the right of judicial review of superior courts
was not curtailed.
The counsel also read to the court and differentiated
the scope of Article 199 and Article 184 of the Constitution. Regarding
the validity of verbal order, he also relied upon another judgment
of the SC in which verbal cancellation order of an allotment of
plot was declared illegal by the Supreme Court of Pakistan.
It was further argued by the petitioners’
advocate that this action of respondents was also against Section
24-A of the General Clauses Act, which makes it mandatory for the
respondents to inform the reasons of suspension and also allow opportunity
of hearing to the aggrieved persons.
The additional advocate general, who was on court
notice, relied upon a condition of landing right license and said
that in emergency, the authority might suspend the license. The
petitioners’ counsel submitted that this condition was irrelevant
in the present circumstances where except the Geo TV’s four
channels, all other channels banned on the same day with Geo TV
had been now restored and this condition was not applicable to Geo
only.
He further argued that even applying this condition,
it was necessary for Pemra to issue show-cause notice or reasons
to Geo TV channels but except a verbal direction to cable TV operators
nothing was communicated in writing. The act of Pemra, besides being
discriminatory, is also a serious violation of Section 24-A of General
Clauses Act and also against Pemra’s own laws, rules and regulations.
Mohammad Ali Mazhar submitted many other foreign
origin channels were being relayed even in emergency situation and
Geo – a Pakistani origin channel – was under suspension.
On this provision, the bench also asked the additional advocate
general that how even in an emergency, a channel could be suspended
without any written order or notice, to which no response was given
by him, except saying that the petitioners had accepted the terms
and conditions of license hence they had no right to challenge it.
The petitioners’ counsel, in response to this
argument, argued that the petitioners did not only accept the terms
and conditions of their landing right licenses but also accepted
all Pemra laws but the present action of suspension of Geo TV transmission
was not supported by any Pemra law, rules or regulations and was
also against the principle of natural justice.
He further submitted that by these petitions, the
PCO or emergency had not been challenged but it was urged that the
petitioners were lawful licensee and Pemra being a statutory body
should act and treat the petitioners in accordance with the law
and their right to business had been seriously infringed by the
unlawful ban.
The court observed that on the one hand the DAG
took the plea that the government took no action against the petitioners
and on the other he stated that the attorney general for Pakistan
himself would advance arguments against the petitions.
The bench asked DAG Rizwan Ahmed Siddiqui as to
what was the actual stand of the government. However, after hearing
the arguments, the court dismissed both the petitions on technical
grounds.
It was
the sixth date of hearing on Tuesday and after at least more than
23 days, the bench dismissed the petitions as being non-maintainable
under the PCO and emergency, while no written comments were filed
by the respondent in spite of availing many chances. The detailed
judgment in the petitions will be given later by the court.
|
SC
returns petition challenging closure of TV channels
Sohail Khan, The News
December 05, 2007 |
http://www.thenews.com.pk/top_story_detail.asp?Id=11547
ISLAMABAD: The
Supreme Court on Tuesday returned the constitutional petition challenging
the closure of TV channels as well as amending the provisions of
the Pemra Ordinance 2002 with the objections that the petition was
not maintainable as the petitioner had no locus standi to file it.
A letter addressed
to Advocate-on-Record (AOR) of the Supreme Court Ejaz Muhammad Khan,
a copy of which is available with The News, stated that the said
constitutional petition filed by him under Article 184(3) of the
Constitution was not entertainable as prima facie the petitioner
had no locus standi to file it.
It was further
stated that the constitutional petition had been filed under Article
184(3) of the Constitution but after the promulgation of Provisional
Constitution Order (PCO), the scope of the said article of the Constitution
had been curtailed.
Similarly, the
advocate-on-record was also informed that he had not provided the
certificate as required under Order XXV Rule 6 of the Supreme Court
Rules 1980. “The constitutional petition is therefore, returned
herewith in original being not entertainable along with its paper
books,” says the letter.
Restrictions
on TV channels clamped on November 3 after the proclamation of emergency
and the imposition of the PCO were challenged in the Supreme Court,
praying that restrictions on the channels be declared illegal, void
and without lawful authority.
The petition
was filed in the superior court the other day by Qazi Sheharyar
Iqbal, advocate, praying the apex court that the blocked TV channels
should be allowed to start their normal operations so as to enable
the people of Pakistan to enjoy their right of choice of information
and freedom of speech and expression.
The petition
was filed under Article 184(3) of the Constitution, making the Federation
of Pakistan through the secretary Ministry of Information and the
Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority (Pemra) through its
chairman as respondents.
The petitioner
had challenged the promulgation of Ordinance, LXV of 2007 whereby
the provisions of the Pemra Ordinance, 2002 were further amended.
He had prayed
to the court to strike down the provisions of Sections 20 and 33
of the ordinance of 2002 and other provisions being unreasonable
restrictions on the freedom of speech and expression guaranteed
under the Constitution along with any further relief which the court
considered just and proper in the facts and circumstance of the
case.
|
Govt
retires 24 High Court judges
The News
December 05, 2007 |
http://www.thenews.com.pk/top_story_detail.asp?Id=11540
12 SHC, 10 LHC,
two PHC judges had refused to take oath under PCO
ISLAMABAD:
The government on Tuesday issued a notification of retirement of
24 High Court judges who did not take oath under the Provisional
Constitution Order (PCO).
According to
the notification issued by the Ministry of Law, the judges who stand
retired include 12 judges of the Sindh High Court (SHC), 10 of the
Lahore High Court (LHC) and two judges of the Peshawar High Court
(PHC).
The retired
Sindh High Court judges are Justice Ahmed Hussain Jaffery, Justice
Khilji Arif Hussain, Justice Amir Hani Muslim, Justice Gulzar Ahmed,
Justice Maqbool Baqar, Justice Muhammad Athar Saeed, Justice Faisal
Arab, Justice Sajjad Ali Shah, Justice Zafar Khan Sherwani, Justice
Salman Ansari, Justice Abdul Rasheed Kalhwar, and Justice Arshad
Siraj.
The Lahore High
Court judges who have been retired are Justice Khwaja Muhammad Sharif,
Justice Saqib Nisar, Justice Asif Khosa, Justice Muhammad Tahir
Ali, Justice Ijaz Ahmed Chaudhry, Justice M A Shahid Siddiqui, Justice
Muhammad Jahangir Arshad, Justice Iqbal Hameed-ur-Rehman, Justice
Muhammad Ata Bandial and Justice Shaikh Azmat Saeed.
Two judges of
the Peshawar High Court Justice Ejaz Afzal Khan and Justice Dost
Muhammad were also included in the list of retired judges. Online
adds: More than 60 judges including Chief Justice of Pakistan Justice
Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, Chief Justice Sindh High Court Justice
Sabih Uddin Ahmed and Chief Justice Peshawar High Court Justice
Tariq Pervez refused to take oath under the PCO following its promulgation
and imposition of emergency rule in the country on November 03.
According to
Attorney General Malik Qayyum, the services of these judges were
terminated the moment they refused to take fresh oath under the
PCO while the notification issued by the law ministry on Tuesday
was aimed to complete the official proceedings.
Sources told
the Online that the president was not ready to accept the demand
of different circles with regard to the reinstatement of the deposed
judges of the Supreme Court and the high courts. After lifting emergency
and the end of the PCO on December 16, the deposed judges will not
be reinstated because their services have been terminated.
|
Deposed
judges get letters to vacate official residences
Umar Cheema, The News
December 05, 2007 |
http://www.thenews.com.pk/top_story_detail.asp?Id=11555
ISLAMABAD:
The Supreme Court has allotted residences of deposed judges to newly
appointed judges, who took oath under the Provisional Constitution
Order (PCO).
However, the
residence of deposed chief justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry has
not been allotted to Justice Abdul Hameed Dogar, the new chief justice
of post-Nov 3 Supreme Court.
The assistant
registrar, who issued this office order, was reluctant to speak
on the subject. The Supreme Court registrar was not available for
comments while the PRO denied any knowledge about this development.
An honourable deposed judge, Justice Rana Bhagwandas, confirmed
to The News having received a written intimation in this regard
from the court and termed it a pressure tactic.
Justice Bhagwandas,
however, told The News that their residences had been allotted to
the new PCO judges despite availability of a number of bungalows
lying vacant nearby and were sufficient to accommodate new comers.
Even the residence
of a deposed judge, Justice Javed Iqbal, has been allotted to a
veteran PCO judge, Justice Faqir Mohammad Khokhar, already residing
in the Judges Enclave. Khokhar's present bungalow has been designated
to a new PCO judge, Justice Qaim Jan.
The bungalow
of another deposed judge, Sardar Raza Muhammad Khan, has been allotted
to Musa Leghari, a newly appointed Supreme Court judge.
Ejazul Hassan,
another newly appointed judge, has been allotted the residence of
the deposed judge, Shakirullah Jan. Justice Shabbir Akhtar has been
allotted the bungalow of deposed judge Tasadduq Jillani.Deposed
Justice Ghulam Rabbani's bungalow has been allotted to Justice Zia
Pervez.
About the chief
justice's residence, he said it was a designated house for the chief
justice and has not been allotted to Justice Dogar.
Justice Bhagwandas,
however, said the official letter he and other colleagues received
did not mention any time frame to vacate the residences. "By
making new allotments, they seem to have implied as if the residences
were lying vacant," he said. Presently, there are 18 bungalows
in the Judges Enclave. One each has been allotted to Federal Shariat
Court's Chief Justice Fida Muhammad Khan and Federal Tax Ombudsman
Justice Munir A Sheikh. |
Musharraf
PR team faces protest from Pakistanis in UK
Malaysia Sun
December 5, 2007 |
http://story.malaysiasun.com/index.php/ct/9/cid/303b19022816233b/id/306431/cs/1/
London: Pakistanis living
in London have mounted a counter campaign against the week-long
visit of former ISI chief Lt-General (retired) Javed Ashraf Qazi
and former State Information Minister Tariq Azim, who appears to
be on a PR job for President Pervez Musharraf.
The Campaign Against
Martial Law in Pakistan (CAMLP), a recently formed group of Pakistani
students, lawyers, doctors, journalists and civil society activists
in the UK, have sent protest notes to all those British officials
and non-officials who have consented to meet Musharraf's special
envoys.
The group has also chalked
out an elaborate programme to stage protest demonstrations in front
of all the meeting venues where the two would be visiting to present
their version of what is happening in Pakistan.
On Tuesday, Qazi and
Azim, met Lord Mark Malloch Brown, Minister of State for Africa,
Asia and United Nations, MP Khalid Mahmood, members of All Party
Parliamentary Group, and Mike Gapes, Chairman Foreign Affairs Committee
of House of Commons and members of Pakistani community.
On Wednesday, Azim would
be participating in a panel discussion on 'The plight of Pakistani
media under emergency rule' at the Foreign Press Association.
Ali Dayan of Human Rights
Watch would present the Pakistani media's case and Azim will defend
Musharraf's current media policy.
On the same day, the
special envoys would meet the members of the Pakistan-British Trade
and Investment Forum at the Asia House, the Dawn reported.
|
US
envoy hopes Musharraf will lift emergency, PCO on Dec 16
DailyIndia
December 5, 2007 |
http://www.dailyindia.com/show/197106.php/US-envoy-hopes-Musharraf-will-lift-emergency-PCO-on-Dec-16
Karachi, Dec 5: The United
States Consul General, K Anski, has hoped that President Pervez
Musharraf would lift the emergency and the Provisional Constitutional
Order (PCO) on December 16.
Anski said she was visiting
various parts of the country, particularly the Sindh province, and
had found that Musharraf had taken some steps which might rightly
be described as confidence building measures, something the US Government
is really interested in.
She suggested that the
political parties should take part in the January 8 general election.
Anski said Musharraf
had assured the international community of holding fair, free and
transparent elections in Pakistan.
She said the US also
was deeply concerned about the arrest of political leaders, lawyers
and civil society representatives and wanted immediate release of
all such prisoners.
Commenting on the freedom
of media, Anski said lifting the emergency would ultimately relax
the ban on media, The News reported.
She said the US government
had reiterated upon Musharraf to restore the transmission of Geo
News without any further delay.
|
|
|