|
back
to mainpage |
No
Written order for GEO ban
DAG Sindh High Court
The News, 28 November 2007 |
|
http://www.thenews.com.pk/top_story_detail.asp?Id=11422
KARACHI: Deputy Attorney General (DAG) Rizwan Ahmed Siddiqui said
on Tuesday that no written order was issued for the suspension of
Geo TV channels.
Responding to
the arguments filed by Geo TV counsel Muhammad Ali Mazhar advocate,
the DAG stated this before the Sindh High Court during the hearing
of two constitutional petitions filed by Geo TV Network.
The Sindh High
Court heard on Tuesday two constitutional petitions filed by Independent
Media Corporation (Pvt) Ltd and Birds (Pvt) Ltd against the unlawful
ban and suspension of four TV channels of the petitioners, namely
“Geo News”, “Geo Entertainment”, “Geo
Super” and “Aag TV”.
The bench comprised
Justice Munib Ahmed Khan and Justice Dr Rana Muhammad Shamim. On
the last date of hearing, the DAG was specially directed to file
comments failing which the matter will be finally heard on Nov 27.
When the matter
was taken up at 1:00 pm, the DAG did not file any comments and produced
a news clipping of a newspaper in which he attempted to argue that
Geo News transmission was suspended from Dubai and the matter of
Geo’s restoration is pending as the dialogues are continuing
between the Geo management and Dubai Media City. On this ground
he again sought 10 days’ time to submit comments.
Petitioner’s
counsel Ali Mazhar vehemently opposed the request of adjournment
and seeking further time by the deputy attorney general on the ground
that the court has already given more than 13 days time earlier
to him for filing comments but he failed to do so. He then argued
that this is a very serious matter, as at least the jobs of 4,500
employees are at stake and 4,500 employees mean 4,500 families.
This is the 26th day of suspension and if the suspended channels
are not restored immediately then the petitioners will not be able
to pay their salaries and for the payment of salary approximately
Rs 6 crore are required.
Ali Mazhar produced
a circular issued by Pemra in the month of January 2007 whereby
all cable TV network operators were informed that Independent Media
Corporation (Pvt) Ltd and Birds (Pvt) Ltd have obtained the landing
rights licences of “Geo News” “Geo Entertainment”,
“Geo Super” and “Aag TV” from Pemra and
all cable TV operators were required to relay above channels through
their cable TV networks.
Besides, he
also produced the landing rights application forms, list of eligible
channels and landing rights licence fee tariff available on Pemra
web site. He said after obtaining the landing rights licence, the
petitioners channels have become eligible channels required to be
relayed by all cable TV networks and their eligibility proves from
the landing right licence, cable TV regulations and notification
issued by Pemra in the month of January 2007 requiring all cable
TV operators to relay the above channels of Geo TV Network.
Ali Mazhar argued
that the respondents have suspended the transmission of channels
verbally without issuing any written order or show-cause notice
and this fact is already mentioned in the memo of the petition.
He went to argue,
“Besides, this is also against section 24-A of General Clauses
Act as no written reason has been conveyed or assigned to the petitioners
as to why the transmission has been suspended nor was any opportunity
given to defend any allegation, if any.”
The petitioners’
advocate also argued that on the last date of hearing a list of
21 channels was produced which have been restored and two or three
days earlier, two more channels of ARY were also restored and now
only Geo TV Network channels are under suspension which is highly
discriminatory.
The petitioner’s
counsel further argued that the respondents have nothing to do with
any suspension of Geo News from Dubai as the petitioners are valid
licence holder in Pakistan with valid licence, so their case may
only be adjudged under Pakistani laws.
After hearing
the argument, the court inquired from the deputy attorney general
why Geo TV channels are not allowed to being on air when Pemra has
charged huge licence fee from them. Answering this query, Deputy
Attorney General Rizwan Siddiqui vehemently stated that there is
no written order issued for suspension and the respondents have
not imposed any ban or suspension on Geo TV Network.
On this statement,
Ali Mazhar requested the court to record the statement of the deputy
attorney general. The deputy attorney general also made a submission
that instead of him,the attorney general for Pakistan will himself
argue this matter.
The court said
the deputy attorney general has already taken much time for filing
the comments. Later, the court adjourned the matter for hearing
on Nov 29, 2007 when the matter will be heard for a final decision
regarding the restoration of Geo TV channels’ transmission.
People
eagerly await Geo transmissions
KARACHI: The
public was anxiously waiting for some clear directives on Tuesday
from the Sindh High court on the petitions for the restoration of
Geo News, Geo Entertainment, Aag and Geo Super. When people learnt
that the hearing had been postponed till November 29, a pall of
gloom descended over them. A large number of people telephoned the
Geo offices to express their deep regret and anger at the delay
in restoring the channels. Many Pakistanis also called from foreign
countries to enquire about the decision of the court. Callers said
that since November 3 they had been anxiously waiting for news on
the restoration of their favourite channels. Many callers expressed
their support for the channels and hoped that the honourable court
would swiftly take a decision on this case. They said that the blacking
out of the channels has deprived them of coverage of national and
international issues, as well as entertainment programmes. People
fervently hoped that the channels were swiftly restored. They prayed
that Geo succeeds in its struggle and said that it was not alone
and that it enjoyed the whole-hearted support of the people. |
Media
Bodies agree to improve ties with the government
The News, 28 November 2007 |
http://www.thenews.com.pk/top_story_detail.asp?Id=11430
ISLAMABAD: The representatives of APNS, CPNE, PFUJ and the ministry
of information and broadcasting have agreed to improve the environment
with regard to the government-media relations by deleting all those
provisions from the amended press, newspapers, news agencies and Books
Registration Ordinance 2007, which had caused concern amongst the
print media. The provisions to be deleted relate suspension of declaration
for a period of thirty days and restrictions on publication of certain
material.
In a meeting with the
Minister for Information & Broadcasting Nisar A Memon, the media
representatives also suggested that comprehensive proposals from
these media bodies would be sent to the ministry by Saturday next
so as to move forward on the subjects.
The minister assured
the media delegation that the matter regarding FIRs registered by
law-enforcement agencies against the working journalists before
and after imposition of emergency would be taken up with the authorities
concerned for withdrawal. He assured that the government would take
all necessary confidence building measures, including bilateral
meetings with the publisher/owner of the GEO and Jang/News group.
Hameed
A Haroon, Qazi Mohammed Aslam, Arif Nizami, Khushnood Ali Khan,
Huma Ali, CR Shamsi and Dr Tanveer A Tahir represented the APNS,
CPNE and PFUJ. The Secretary Information and Broadcasting, Syed
Anwar Mehmood, and other officials also attended the meeting.
|
How
Pakistan's Satirists Poke Fun, Politically
Emily Wax
Washington Post, 28 November 2007 |
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/11/27/AR2007112702243.html
LAHORE, Pakistan -- There's a certain darkness to the humor in Pakistan
these days. Take the case of Fasi Zaka and "News, Views and Confused."
The program, a Pakistani version of Comedy Central's "The Daily
Show," features Zaka and a co-anchor. On a recent episode, the
co-anchor teases Zaka about his scruffy, rumpled appearance.
You look terrible. You need to accessorize,"
he tells him. The co-anchor pulls out a black armband, the widely
recognized symbol of protest across Pakistan since President Pervez
Musharraf declared emergency rule Nov. 3. The audience cheers. Zaka
feigns naivete,
quipping, "I'd like to join this fashion movement," and
puts the armband on.
These are not easy times to be a journalist in Pakistan,
let alone an irreverent political comic. Musharraf's government
for several weeks blacked out the country's lively independent news
channels and temporarily detained scores of journalists. Zaka's
show aired last Wednesday night for the first time since the emergency
measures took effect.
Musharraf's government has also sought the help
of allies to contain news coverage. On Nov. 17, the United Arab
Emirates agreed to shut down two of Pakistan's largest and most
popular networks, Geo TV and ARY, which had been broadcasting news
of events in Pakistan via satellite from Dubai.
But dissent is difficult to shut out completely,
and in Pakistan, comedy is emerging as an important tool of government
critics, much as underground satire and thinly veiled jokes were
once powerful forces in the Soviet Union.
Ironically, it was Musharraf who first encouraged
independent media in Pakistan after he took power in 1999. He saw
invigorating the mass media as a way to compete with the plethora
of cable stations based in Pakistan's arch rival, India. Musharraf
himself seemed a darling of the Western media, even appearing in
September 2006 on "The Daily Show," where he sipped jasmine
green tea with Jon Stewart and joked about the whereabouts of Osama
bin Laden.
Now, Musharraf is requiring TV news stations to
sign a code of conduct that subjects journalists to fines and jail
time if they ridicule him or other government officials. Certain
television personalities were targeted in the recent crackdown,
with several talk show hosts being pressured to sign the code of
conduct, both by the government and by their own bosses, who are
worried about lost profits if they stay off the air.
In a recent interview, Musharraf said it was a sensitive
time in Pakistan because of rising extremism. "The media should
not agitate," Musharraf said. "It should join us in the
war on terror."
But many leading journalists here say a free press
is an important tool to question the actions of the state, and sometimes
to make fun of it.
"Views being aired and irreverence and laughter
are a healthy thing," said Jugnu Mohsin, a longtime Pakistani
satirist who writes a monthly humor column called "Mush and
Bush" for the Friday Times, a weekly English-language newspaper
based in Lahore. "You can't crush the human need to laugh,"
she said. "It lets off steam."
During times of crisis and political drama, there is plenty of material
to use for comedic purposes. In one of Mohsin's recent unsigned
columns, Musharraf appears as a wily Bush ally. The two talk about
terrorism but end up plotting to get a Burger King and a McDonald's
into Afghanistan.
"Mush: I thought you decided to partition Afghanistan.
"Bush: Yeah, then we can call it Halfganistan."
Mohsin also writes a satirical column that has targeted
former prime minister Nawaz Sharif and what she calls his "dim
and authoritarian personality, his intolerance of dissent."
"I thought Musharraf was different," said
Mohsin, publisher and managing editor of the Friday Times. "Sadly,
he's conforming to the type."
Leaders are not the only targets. Mohsin's sister
Moni Mohsin writes a column called "Diary of a Social Butterfly,"
which lampoons the country's elite.
Jugnu Mohsin has so far remained out of prison,
but she and husband Najam Sethi, editor in chief of the Friday Times,
have suffered hardships -- threats on their lives, attacks on their
homes -- under previous military governments that were less than
amused with their sense of humor. Sethi has been jailed three times
from the 1970s to the '90s.
While TV shows were largely cut off under Musharraf's
crackdown, small newspapers were allowed to continue publishing.
They represent a vociferous source of opposition and humor.
In one example, a law professor and a journalist
teamed up to write a version of "The Twelve Days of Christmas,"
which appeared in the News, an English-language newspaper.
Theirs begins: "On the first day of Christmas,
my true love gave to me a state of emergency; on the second day
of Christmas, my true love gave to me two Taliban and a state of
emergency."
It ends: "On the twelfth day of Christmas,
my true love gave to me twelve bombers' bombings, eleven laathi
charges, ten Swat beheadings, nine majors gloating, eight foreign
sanctions, seven lawyers tortured, six house arrests, no BBC, four
militants, three rallies, two Taliban and a state of emergency."
A laathi charge is a police tactic involving batons.
"We take rich people and powerful people too
seriously here," said Ahmad Rafay Alam, a professor at Lahore
University of Management Sciences and co-author of the "Twelve
Days" parody. "We should be able to talk about everything,
and misery requires a good sense of humor."
Modern political satire in Pakistan is rooted in
a popular 1980s TV show called "50/50," which managed
to use subtle codes to convey humor.
That's the type of comedy now flourishing in Pakistan.
"We were told to tone it down. But there's always a subtle
way of doing it," said Saad Haroon, a comic with "The
Real News," a satirical live TV show. "At first we were
really shocked, we didn't know what we were going to do. But then
we realized that we can make fun of the fact that we can't make
fun of anything."
Zaka is trying the same type of comedy. At the end
of last Wednesday's show, his cellphone rings.
"It's an emergency," he yells out. Then
the TV blanks to an image of a snowy screen, just as it did after
emergency rule was declared.
|
Spreading
prosperity
Sunny Hundal,
Gurdian, November 28, 2007 |
http://commentisfree.guardian.co.uk/sunny_hundal/2007/11/spreading_prosperity.html.printer.friendly
While much attention has focused over the past decade on the rise
of China and India as economic giants, much less is said about the
Middle East. Until recently there are has been little need to, given
that Arab economies are still woefully underdeveloped and heavily
reliant on oil revenue.
But the rise of Dubai as a centre of trade, finance
and tourism may change all that. Will the Middle East follow, where
Dubai leads? In many ways I would certainly hope so. The country
is no paragon of democracy and human rights, but it is certainly
more responsive to these issues than its neighbours as it is anxious
to attract tourists. Even Britons, flocking there in increasing
numbers, are impressed.
Dubai is a city within an emirate of the same name,
of which there are seven that constitute the United Arab Emirates.
A week ago I arrived at the city for a short trip and two thoughts
struck me after a while.
First, that Dubai is run by Indians. Around 70-75%
of Dubai's population is expatriate, of which most are South Asian
and around half from India. From construction workers to doctors,
lawyers, businessmen and CEOs of major corporations, Indians are
represented in all walks of economic life. This is in sharp contrast
to other parts of the Middle East, where South Asian workers are
treated despicably.
And, though strike action continues despite being
outlawed, it usually pushes the government towards reconciliation
rather than confrontation. Indeed, one (Indian) CEO I spoke to said
such strikes were "helping the authorities put things in perspective"
and laws were "being streamlined with international [labour]
laws." To that extent, Dubai shattered my misconception that
Arabs treated Asians with little regard.
The second thing I noticed was the smell of money
and frenzied opulence that goes with it. Dubai is building its economy
at a staggering rate, announcing project after project to make it
a leader in, well, pretty much everything. There are mini-cities
within Dubai dedicated to sports, media, healthcare, the internet,
motors, festivals, exhibitions, flowers, aviation etc. The list
is long and growing rapidly.
While there, local developers announced the launch
of Dubai Lifestyle City, which is planning to sell around 200 high-end
residential properties worth nearly $700m. Such is the frenzied
atmosphere around real estate that although construction has just
started, around a third of the property has reportedly already been
sold. They even flew in Maria Sharapova to attract publicity for
the launch. The mind boggles.
A report in the Guardian last year asked whether
Dubai could become "the most important place on the planet".
This is an interesting question for several reasons.
Economically, the city is miles ahead of its neighbours
in the Gulf. The fact that it sucks in money, people, and talent
from across the world, and especially from other parts of the Middle
East, could mean that this economic and (relative) social freedom
could end up being exported to carefully watching Arab states.
While travelling I met Natasha, a former resident
of Nottingham who moved there a few years ago to explore opportunities
in real estate. She was frequently homesick and loved the vibe of
London but said she had no plans to come back soon. I met Rupinder,
a British Sikh businesswoman who had moved there with her husband
a few years ago and she said she loved it. There weren't any of
the Muslim fanatics she found in England, she said, because the
ruling sheikh clamped down on them. Dubai's first Gurdwara was opening
soon too. I know of other British Asian friends who have also moved
there for work and see little need to come back.
There is a limit to the freedom the city offers,
of course. When General Pervez Musharraf recently declared martial
law in Pakistan and shut down dissenting television channels, the
popular station Geo TV started broadcasting over the internet from
Dubai. A request from Musharraf soon forced it to shut down again.
The political system still resembles more a monarchy than a democracy
and political dissent is not easily tolerated.
But Dubai's enthusiastic embrace of capitalism,
which some find disconcerting, is exactly what the city and the
Middle East needs as a whole. Developing a prominent and wealthy
middle class is the surest path to greater transparency, secularisation
of politics and intellectual development. The more Middle Eastern
countries depend on tourism for income, as Dubai increasingly plans
to, the more incentive they have to prevent religious fanaticism
developing. It is investing huge amounts of money in education,
technology and learning - all guaranteed to ensure a more politically
aware population in the future.
In a few years, Dubai will offer exactly what other
consumers in the Middle East will want - a brand of capitalism infused
with Arab sensibilities and culture. Hopefully they will then follow
suit. In the meantime, the gold rush is continuing apace.
|
|
|