NEW YORK: The case against Dominique Strauss-Kahn was thrown into further disarray Wednesday as an all-out war broke out between the district attorney's office and the former IMF chief's...
By
AFP
|
July 07, 2011
NEW YORK: The case against Dominique Strauss-Kahn was thrown into further disarray Wednesday as an all-out war broke out between the district attorney's office and the former IMF chief's accuser.
Lawyers for the maid who says Strauss-Kahn tried to rape her in a Manhattan hotel room on May 14 demanded a new prosecutor, accusing the New York district attorney's office of damaging leaks and a potential conflict of interest.
A spokeswoman for District Attorney Cyrus Vance hit back in an emailed statement, calling the recusal request "wholly without merit."
The war between the alleged victim and those supposedly pursuing the case against Strauss-Kahn came days after the prosecution admitted in a dramatic court hearing that it had grave doubts about her credibility.
They said she had given false information on tax and asylum application forms, including about an alleged gang rape in Guinea. Perhaps even more damaging, she had lied in sworn testimony about the Strauss-Kahn case.
The maid initially told the grand jury, which decided back in May that the case could proceed, that she had left Strauss-Kahn's room after the alleged sexual assault and waited in a hallway until he had gone.
Prosecutors revealed Friday that she later recanted that version of events, saying she went on to clean another room and returned to Strauss-Kahn's room to clean it before telling a supervisor about the alleged incident.
In the latest twist to the stunning case, the maid's lawyer Kenneth Thompson sent a letter Wednesday to Vance requesting he immediately recuse himself from the case and allow the appointment of a special prosecutor.
Most of Thompson's four-page letter detailed alleged leaks from Vance's office, in particular regarding a New York Times story about a conversation the maid had with a jailed felon that was being secretly recorded.
He wrote that chief assistant district attorney Daniel Alonso called him on June 30 and stated that during the conversation the maid had said "words to the effect" that "this guy has a lot of money. I know what I'm doing."
The New York Times then reported the details of the maid's phone conversation the following day using almost exactly the same words Alonso had used, he said.
Among "several other orchestrated leaks and false accounts," Thompson said he was truly saddened that a "senior prosecutor" had refused to deny a New York Post tabloid story accusing the maid of being a prostitute.
Thompson mentioned a "potential conflict of interest" because the head of the prosecutor's trial division is married to one of Strauss-Kahn's lawyers involved in the case.
Thompson also noted that one of the prosecutors had "screamed at and disrespected the victim while she met with them," and was still assigned to the case.
This "gives us great concern about whether your office can truly determine what is in the interest of justice."
Thompson had already said after Friday's hearing that he felt the prosecution was laying the groundwork to dismiss the case and accused Vance of not having the courage to go through with it.
Lawyers for both the defense and the prosecution held a meeting Wednesday at Vance's office but gave no clue afterwards as to whether the case was headed for dismissal, a possible plea deal, or still to trial. (AFP)