Senate polls: SC reserves opinion on presidential reference regarding open-ballot voting

CJP says its Parliament's job to pass resolutions; court could only give opinion on Article 226's implementation

By
Web Desk
|
Photo: File
  • SC has decided to reserve its opinion regarding the presidential reference seeking an open-ballot voting system in the Senate polls
  • A five-judge, larger bench headed by CJP concluded the proceedings
  • CJP stressed that its the Parliament's job to pass resolutions, court could only give an opinion on the implementation of Article 226


ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Court on Thursday reserved its decision on the presidential reference seeking an open-ballot voting system in the Senate elections.

A five-judge, larger bench, headed by Chief Justice of Pakistan Gulzar Ahmed heard the case.

During the hearing, Pakistan Bar Council's lawyer Mansoor Usman Awan argued that holding elections through an open-ballot system has been unprecedented in Pakistan, adding that the secrecy of casting votes is the essence of elections.

The Chief Justice of Pakistan remarked that it was the Parliament's job to pass resolutions so that the electoral process could become transparent, adding that the court will only give its opinion regarding the implementation of Article 226.

Chief Justice Gulzar Ahmed added that all political parties have acknowledged the rampant corruption in the process of Senate elections and videos proving that have also emerged, however, no one is ready to take steps to eradicate the problem.

"All parties demand transparent elections but no one is ready to take an initiative," the CJP said. "We have been hearing from day one that the party decides which candidates to vote for."

Read more: ECP breaks silence over Senate elections controversy

Arguments by Lahore High Court lawyer

During the hearing, the lawyer of the Lahore High Court Khurram Chughtai said that the federal government has no authority to seek an opinion from the court. In response, the Chief Justice said that the reference in the court has been sent by the president of Pakistan.

Khurram Chughtai said that the Attorney General is the advocate of the federal government and not the president, adding that opinions were sought from all political parties before drafting the Election Act. 

Sheikh Rashid, Arif Alvi, and Shibli Faraz were also members of the Election Act Committee, while 89 meetings were held before drafting the Act, he said.

Khurram Chughtai added that President Arif Ali himself was a member of the Constitutional Reforms Committee, along with many of the sitting ministers in the cabinet.

Chughtai also said that the president of Pakistan has to act on the advice of the cabinet or the prime minister, on which the CJP told him to limit his arguments to the questions raised.

'Current reference most important case of my life': Attorney General

During the hearing, the Attorney General said that the current reference is "the most important case of his life," adding "deep states prefer secrecy of the election as compared to its transparency."

Read more: SC allows Sindh a week to respond in Senate polls reference