Alleged audio of Malik Riaz, daughter reveals Bushra Bibi refused to accept 3-carat diamond ring

• In audio, Amber Riaz could be heard telling her father a 5-carat diamond ring should be sent to Bushra Bibi.
• She says ring would cost Rs10 million, to which Riaz agrees.
• Malik Riaz rejects audio's authenticity, says his "name was used to settle personal and political scores."
  

LAHORE: Punjab government spokesman Ataullah Tarar Sunday revealed an alleged audio recording of a conversation between property tycoon Malik Riaz and his daughter Amber Riaz in which the two could be heard discussing how the former first lady Bushra Bibi refused to accept a three-carat diamond ring from them.

The audio was brought to the fore by Tarar and PML-N Secretary Information Azma Bukhari during a press conference in Lahore today.

However, Riaz has rejected the authenticity of the audio, saying that his "name was used to settle personal and political scores."

In a statement posted to Twitter, Riaz alleged that the audio was generated through deep fake technology, therefore, it shouldn't come as a surprise. 

"I do not wish [to be] involved in political campaigns of any political party," he wrote, adding that he would pursue the matter legally.

The alleged audio 

In the alleged audio, Amber could be heard telling her father — who enjoys congenial relations with all Pakistani politicians — that she had sent the then-first lady a three-carat diamond ring which she had refused to accept.

Without mentioning Farah Gogi's — originally known as Farah Khan — name in the audio, Amber said that she had a meeting with "her" (Farah) on Saturday, therefore, a five-carat diamond ring should be arranged for Bushra Bibi before that, adding that the ring would cost Rs10 million. 

Amber further told her father that she (Farah) had told her that it was "no big deal for the first lady to own a three-carat ring", therefore, it was "unbecoming of them to send her something that everybody could own."

Upon hearing that, Riaz could be heard telling his daughter "to get the ring that they (the first lady and Gogi) were demanding."

During the call, Amber could also be heard telling her father that the "locked doors to his sites will be opened the next morning", adding that "she" (Farah) had assured her that she received a call from Imran Khan.

"She (Farah) told me that she had received a phone call from Khan Sahab and said that he would take guarantee for the closure of the [cases] for which the reports have been submitted to him. You will also get a letter from Shahzad Akbar tomorrow," Amber could be heard telling her father.

If Imran Khan is honest, Farah Gogi should take next flight to Pakistan: Tarar

During the press conference today, Tarar had said that if PTI Chairman Imran Khan was an honest man, then his wife's close aide Farah Gogi — who is in Dubai since corruption allegations were levelled against her by the government — should take the next flight to Pakistan.

When the PTI government was in power, Gogi accumulated assets worth billions of rupees," he said, adding that diamonds worth billions of rupees were sent to Dubai from Pakistan where they were sold off.

He further alleged that Gogi was involved in the transfer and appointments of government officials in Punjab against hefty payments.

"The matter is not confined to the diamond dealings but soon, information about the selling of expensive paintings and watches will come to the fore too," Tarar said, adding that once these items were sold in Dubai, money was transferred to Pakistan via hundis.

The Punjab government spokesperson went on to say that Farah Gogi was involved in what could be termed "Asia's largest money-laundering scandal."

"I, therefore, demand that if Imran Khan is an honest man, then Farah Gogi should board the next flight to Pakistan," Tarar said.

It should be recalled that back in May when allegations of corruption had surfaced against Farah Gogi, Khan had come to her rescue and had said that she was innocent, adding that "cases registered against her were totally wrong" as "wealth beyond known sources of income" applied to public office holders only.