There isn’t enough money

Pakistan has witnessed a steep decline over the last two years, maybe the steepest in its post-partition (1971) history. If there is one overarching trigger or issue that is at the heart of these symptoms of national decline, it is that ‘there isn’t enough money’.

There seems to be a broad consensus about how serious a problem this is. But even now, at every step of the way, the Pakistani elite is consistently seeking to fix the problem by doing the easier (and more unsustainable) thing. Escapism and short-sightedness are ingrained in nearly every single aspect of national life. 

Khurram Husain has explained the ‘there isn’t enough money’ problem in detail over the last several weeks. I want to try to build on his important work to elaborate on the challenge and demonstrate that the solutions being devised and deployed will be neither durable nor sustainable.

There isn’t enough money. Period. But there are two kinds of money, Pakistan and especially the Pakistani government needs: rupees and dollars.

The government needs rupees to pay its bills here at home — the biggest component of these bills is the debt servicing on loans the government takes from banks here at home, in Pakistan, and the salaries and pensions that the government pays to teachers, soldiers, doctors, nurses and the spectrum of public-sector employees (including at many totally dysfunctional organisations).

The government needs dollars to pay its bills both here at home and abroad — the biggest component of these bills is the debt servicing on loans the government takes from other countries, from multilateral organisations, from banks, and from investors that buy Pakistani bonds.

But Pakistan also has other kinds of dollar-denominated bills like the fuel it needs to run its power plants, the gasoline and diesel it needs to run cars and buses, the weapons it needs to keep itself safe from bullies near and far, the machinery and electronics that it needs to buy to keep factories and power plants functional, and the raw materials and value-added inputs that help those factories manufacture what Pakistanis consume every day.

Since the Pakistani elite has the power to magically make more rupees (by ordering the printing of more rupees), and it has no power at all to magically make more dollars, this elite is understandably more interested in solving the dollar problem than it is in solving the rupee problem. In the elite’s minds, the rupee problem is no problem at all: just keep printing more rupees.

This is a classic example of how the elite’s biases end up ruining the very foundation of the elite’s understanding of the key problem and as a result end up manufacturing half-solutions or solutions to second-order problems. We see this problem at every step of the diagnosis.

The focus on the dollar problem is fine if it were to be accompanied by a focus on the rupee problem, but there is a massive imbalance in the problem identification process and so the solutions themselves are completely imbalanced. 

It isn’t that the wrong problems are being identified or that the wrong solutions to those problems are being pursued — whether it is putting the foreign exchange smugglers on notice and rationalising the rupee to dollar rate, or trying to establish bodies like the Special Investment Facilitation Council (SIFC) to create transactions in which Pakistan receives dollars from buyers of its assets. 

These are fine solutions, for the time being, to real problems. But they are not the most urgent or even the most cancerous problems within the ‘there isn’t enough money’ crisis.

The most urgent and cancerous problem of ‘there isn’t enough money’ is that little magic trick at the disposal of the Pakistani elite: just keep printing more rupees. 

The power to print more rupees allows the Pakistani elite to avoid the real world. In the real world, when you run out of money, you either find more money, or you stop spending money, or a little bit of both.

Truth be told, elites in most countries try to avoid this math. But in most countries, elites also understand that the most important means of solving the ‘there isn’t enough money’ problem is to increase government revenue. 

The heart of government revenue for most normal countries is a robust system of taxation in which rich people pay more taxes than poor people. This is how countries survive and sustain their systems.

Very few countries do this in the most just or egalitarian way, but most stable and prosperous countries have done enough and keep doing enough to keep their systems from falling apart. 

The elites of these countries don’t believe in magic: they just use math to solve math problems. Pakistan’s system is falling apart because its elites know that there is no such thing as magic, but they keep using magic tricks to try to solve math problems.

Pakistan’s own data shows that the government revenue to GDP ratio last fiscal year was 11.4%. The government expenditure to GDP ratio for the same year was 19.1%. This 7.7% of GDP gap is not small. 

It is Rs6.5 trillion. It seems the government also borrowed domestically to repay some of the external loans (around Rs680 billion, or around $2.26 billion).

These are insane numbers not just because of the huge gaps they represent but also because of their repercussions. If you are printing rupees to pay off previous loans, and in some cases, directly or indirectly printing rupees to pay off loans foreign currency loans — you have no chance of stopping the bleeding of your economic strength. Zero chance. 

Every year these gaps are filled through printing rupees and borrowing dollars, but if you follow the news, Pakistan actually doesn’t borrow THAT much in dollars. 

A billion here, a billion there; even the International Monetary Fund (IMF) only lends small amounts over short periods of time now ($3.2 billion over nine months most recently). Want to know why?

Because everybody knows ‘there isn’t enough money’ and isn’t making the dollars as readily available as they used to. Remember that thing about the elites of other countries? They use math to solve math problems. They see Pakistan. They see that Pakistan’s elite only collect 11.4% of their GDP in taxes and then print rupees (and call Kristina Georgieva) like there is no tomorrow. 

Those calls are about that 7.7% gap between Pakistan’s revenues and Pakistan’s expenses. Now we can frame external financing mechanisms any way we want — strategic partners, banks, friends or loan sharks — but the math doesn’t change because of the labels. It stays the same. Pakistan’s sources of financing know that every year it is getting harder and harder for Pakistan to repay the dollars it borrowed earlier.

What does the Pakistani elite do when confronted by this simple math? It goes back to doing the only thing it really knows how to do: the magic trick of printing more rupees.

Even magic has limits. Those limits have now been breached. The continued printing of rupees is a cancer. At stages one and two and three, this cancer ate away at the vitality of the banking and finance sector, destroyed the capacity for government to think and plan, and disembowelled institutions like the FBR. 

But this is now a stage four cancer. It is now eating away at the basic functioning of the economy — the printing of rupees fuels the persistently high rupee-to-dollar exchange rate and it is the cause of explosive inflation.

The temporary halt on the rupee’s slide is a welcome development and perhaps even stricter measures to prevent smuggling and hoarding may be merited. But these measures are broadly in the category of magic — not math. They cannot prevent the rupee from eventually falling even further. If you keep printing rupees, nothing can. It’s just math. 

Magicians and jesters like some of the rent seekers that hold caretaker cabinet positions, can keep yelling abracadabra, but they cannot alter mathematics. Khurram Husain’s warnings about the growing gap between net foreign assets (NFAs) and net domestic assets (NDAs) can be heeded now or they can be heeded later — but there is no escaping math. Even magic has limits.

The writer is an analyst and commentator.

Disclaimer: The viewpoints expressed in this piece are the writer's own and don't necessarily reflect Geo.tv's editorial policy.

Originally published in The News