Suspension
and shuffling
of Geo on
cable...Several
channels had
shown Qawwali
many times
before Geo
and over 60
times afterwards
to increase
their ratings;
even genuine
security threat
cannot justify
cable operators’
illegal act
of not showing
Geo; Balochistan
High Court
chief justice
had said if
security threat
is accepted
as a valid
excuse to
break the
law, then
there will
be anarchy
all over the
country; judges,
lawyers, police,
media and
others also
face security
threats but
act within
the legal
framework;
one media
group that
owns a TV
channel has
also concluded
a business
deal with
cable operators;
govt and Pemra
know this
fact but fail
to take corrective
measures;
if court forms
a commission,
many secrets
can come to
the fore;
why did Geo
suspension,
shuffling
on the cable
start after
complaint
in Pemra following
attack on
Hamid Mir?
ISLAMABAD:
In response
to the cable
operators’
bogus excuses
that they
cannot show
Geo because
of security
threats, a
Jang Group
spokesman
has come up
with a rejoinder.
The spokesman
said it is
a bogus excuse
and a total
lie. The incident
in Sadiqabad
was also totally
stage-managed
to create
this excuse.
No one threatens
these cable
operators
when they
show round-the-clock
illegal Indian
dances. No
one threatens
these cable
operators
when they
show channels
that have
shown blasphemous
content 60
times more
than Geo.
The spokesman
said as many
as five channels
also faced
many court
cases and
police action
in this regard
but surprisingly,
the cable
operators
do not receive
threats for
showing these
channels.
Even before
Geo has shown
it, two leading
channels have
already aired
it many times.
The spokesman
said a security
threat was
also raised
as an excuse
during the
last government
when cable
operators
suspended
transmission
of Geo News.
The excuse
of a security
threat then
was exposed
as completely
bogus when
the Supreme
Court of Pakistan
told chairman
Pemra that
he could not
leave the
courtroom
till the Geo
News transmission
was restored
by cable operators
all over the
country. The
result was
that within
three hours,
Geo News’
transmission
was restored
all over the
country.
The spokesman
said cable
operators,
just like
broadcasters,
are operating
on the basis
of a licence
that they
have applied
for and that
Pemra has
granted them.
The basic
term of the
license is
that no cable
operator can
itself suspend
or disrupt
transmission
of a licensed
channel unless
Pemra directs
it to do so.
If a cable
operator violates
this term
of licence,
its licence
is liable
to be revoked.
Even if security
threat is
accepted as
genuine, this
cannot be
used as an
excuse for
a cable operator
to violate
the term of
their licence
by illegally
suspending
Geo’s
transmission.
“What
if a duly
licensed mobile
phone company
suspends its
mobile phone
network for
a week and
uses security
threat as
an excuse
when PTA wants
to suspend
its licence?
What if a
duly licensed
commercial
bank shuts
down all its
operations
all over the
country and
uses security
threat as
an excuse
when State
Bank of Pakistan
wants to suspend
its licence?
And what about
our police
that face
life threat
on a daily
basis? Can
police officers
remain at
home drawing
the salaries
on the pretext
that they
are facing
security threats?
And what about
courts and
honourable
judges, especially
those of lower
courts, who
are expected
to try and
convict dangerous
criminals
and terrorists?”
the spokesman
said.
He reminded
that when
Chief Justice
of Balochistan
High Court
Qazi Faiz
Isa summoned
journalists
and editors
of all the
newspapers
of Balochistan
and questioned
them as to
why they were
publishing
versions of
terrorists,
who claimed
responsibility
of killing
policemen.
When publishers
of those newspapers
produced before
him evidence
of serious
threat that
they are facing
in Balochistan,
Chief Justice
Qazi Faiz
Isa gave them
a long summon.
He said that
don’t
publish any
newspaper
if you cannot
face any threat.
He said if
security threat
is accepted
as a valid
excuse to
break the
law then there
will be anarchy
all over the
country. The
chief justice
also said
that if security
threat is
valid then
he and his
fellow judges
in Balochistan
should stop
hearing cases
and dispensing
justice just
because their
lives were
threatened.
The spokesman
said the cable
operators
have decided
to do their
business in
Pakistan within
the prevailing
environment.
They cannot
pretend that
they are working
in some European
country. Lawyers,
judges, police
etc. everyone
is facing
security threat
in Pakistan
these days.
This does
not exempt
people to
just violate
their legal
obligation
and use security
threat as
an excuse.
He said Geo
itself received
a most direct
and serious
threat in
writing from
terrorists
who wanted
their version
and their
ideology to
be properly
broadcasted.
“Just
because it
received the
threat, can
Geo broadcast
TTP’s
version when
it is murdering
and beheading
our soldiers?
Will its licence
not be liable
to be revoked?
Can any channel
in Pakistan
start showing
TTP’s
version round
the clock
just because
it is facing
security threats?”
The spokesman
further said
even if the
threat being
faced by cable
operators
is genuine,
then it has
nothing to
do between
cable operation
(the licensee)
and Pemra
(the licensor)
for correct
and legal
position is
if any cable
operator violates
terms of its
licence, e.g.
by keeping
transmission
of Geo suspended
when Pemra
has directed
them to show
it, its licence
is liable
to be revoked.
If a cable
operator is
receiving
life threat
because of
some business
dispute or
professional
rivalry or
from some
extortionist
or criminals
or even because
of showing
any channel
of Geo, it
is a matter
between cable
operator and
police. If
they are facing
any threat
then they
should seek
help from
police and
pursue remedies
through law
enforcing
agencies.
Instead of
the path provided
under the
law they cannot
just suspend
valid transmission
of Geo and
thus violate
a direction
of Pemra.
The spokesman
said suspension
of Geo News
by Pemra ended
two weeks
ago and Pemra
has never
suspended
Geo Kahani
and Geo Tez.
Despite this,
Geo News is
either not
being shown
in 80 per
cent areas
of Pakistan
or it has
been pushed
to last channels
where it is
difficult/impossible
for viewers
to find. Geo
Kahani and
Geo Tez are
also not being
shown.
He said the
cable operators
are deliberately
refusing to
show channels
of Geo because
they are being
threatened
for showing
channels of
Geo.The federal
government
and Pemra
have only
two options.
Either what
cable operators
are claiming
is a lie in
which case
they must
take action
against them
to restore
transmission
of all Geo
channels.
Or if the
federal government
and Pemra
believe that
the excuse
of cable operators
regarding
security threat
is genuine
they must
make a candid
public admission
of it:
“a.
All cable
operators
are liable
to show Geo
channels;
b. 80 percent
cable operators
are not showing
it because
some hidden
force is threatening
all of them
from doing
so;
c. There is
nothing that
the federal
government
can do about
it because
it simply
has no writ
to do anything
about the
people who
are threatening
cable operators.”
After that,
at least Geo
can claim
compensation
for the government’s
failure to
fulfil its
obligations.
On the cable
operators
excuse that
they are showing
Geo at last
numbers because
it is their
discretion
on which number
to show it
and also that
number of
TV channels
that have
been licensed
by Pemra is
far in excess
of the capacity
of TV sets
owned by ordinary
people, the
spokesman
reminded that
in 2010, when
hearing a
petition of
Geo, honourable
Supreme Court
set up a one-member
media commission
to look, among
other things,
into the issue
of shuffling
and placement
of channels.
According
to the commission
report, cable
operators
are constitutionally
required to
show TV channels
having nationwide
viewership
at starting
numbers. This
was a constitutional
requirement
and the right
of the viewers.
The commission
also found
that shuffling
of channels,
disrupting
their signals,
throwing them
at last numbers
etc. was illegal.
The honourable
Supreme Court
adopted that
report and
made it part
of its judgment.
In the latest
petition of
Geo News,
honourable
Supreme Court
has once again
reproduced
from 2010
judgment and
from the Media
Commission
Report and
disposed off
Geo News’
petition only
when Pemra
undertook
to restore
the channel
to its original
position.
So it is not
up to discretion
of cable operators
to decide
to show Geo
News at No.
3 position
today and
No. 93 tomorrow.
According
to the Supreme
Court judgment
each cable
operator has
a constitutional
obligation
to show Geo
News and all
Geo channels
at their original
starting numbers.
The spokesman
said Pemra’s
direction
to cable operators
also requires
each licensee
cable operator
to restore
Geo news transmission
at its original
position.
This also
shows that
the discussion
of their own
discretion
and capacity
of TV set
is bogus and
mala fide.
The spokesman
said all cable
operators
were showing
Geo channels
at certain
numbers on
19th April.
“Why
is it that
after Pemra
received a
complaint
about Geo
following
attack on
Hamid Mir
on 19th April,
cable operators
are either
blocking its
transmission
or are making
every kind
of excuse
not to show
it at its
original position?
Why is it
all of a sudden
cable operators
are using
excuses such
as it being
a matter of
their own
discretion
and that TV
sets do not
have capacity
to show all
the licensed
channels when
there was
no such talk
before 19th
April 2014?”
The spokesman
said the original
scheme put
in place through
Pemra Ordinance
for regulation
of electronic
industry anticipated
and sought
to prevent
this very
problem by
barring any
broadcasters
from owning
or controlling
a cable business
and vice versa.
The implementers
of the scheme
were aware
that even
if one TV
broadcaster
were given
control over
cable operation,
it would use
that power
to damage
competitors
in the same
way that the
Geo’s
competitors
are doing
today.
The spokesman
said the real
problem is
that one media
group that
owns one news
channel has
purchased
or, directly
or indirectly,
concluded
a business
deal with
cable operators
in the country
while apparently
cable operators
are still
continuing
with their
previous names
and owners,
in reality
they are in
the hands
of one media
group, the
owner of which
is openly
boasting that
Geo is finished,
“I will
keep Geo channels
off air and
because of
lack of viewership
they will
not get any
advertisements
and they will
go bankrupt
anytime now.”
The spokesman
said all cable
operators
led by Khalid
Arain are
now employees
of that group
and they only
do and say
what the owner
of that group
instructs
them to do.
Both Khalid
Arain and
owner of the
media group
use the name
of hidden
hands to get
the Geo closed.
They claim
that they
are acting
on behalf
of hidden
hands. They
also arrange
meetings of
cable operators
with hidden
hands.
The spokesman
said if the
apex court
forms a commission,
many secrets
will come
to the fore.
He said the
Pemra and
the federal
government
are fully
aware about
the above
dangerous
development
and are yet
avoiding doing
anything about
it.
|